Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1988

Freeland v. Freeland

Freeland v. Freeland
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 7, 1988 · Joanos, Nimmons, Wigginton
534 So. 2d 890; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2651; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5465; 1988 WL 129123 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Freeland v. Freeland

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. The required payment of the second mortgage should be affirmed as either equitable distribution or alimony. We remand to the trial court for clarification as to which of the above classifications was intended. See Zediker v. Zediker, 398 So.2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.