Freeland v. Freeland
Freeland v. Freeland
534 So. 2d 890; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2651; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5465; 1988 WL 129123
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Freeland v. Freeland
Opinion of the Court
We affirm. The required payment of the second mortgage should be affirmed as either equitable distribution or alimony. We remand to the trial court for clarification as to which of the above classifications was intended. See Zediker v. Zediker, 398 So.2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.