San Pedro v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
San Pedro v. State, 561 So. 2d 1163 (1988)
13 Fla. L. Weekly 2079; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3967; 1988 WL 91207
Baskin, McNulty, Schwartz

San Pedro v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant seeks review of an upward departure from the sentencing guidelines. Both of the grounds1 relied upon below have since been held insufficient by determinative decisions of our supreme court. State v. Jones, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1988) invalidates the first basis for departure; State v. Hope, 529 So.2d 275 (Fla. 1988) the second. Accordingly, the cause is remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.

. 1. That the six counts of unlawful compensation for which the defendant was convicted occurred on a continuing basis over a relatively short period of time....

2. That the primary purpose of the six counts of unlawful compensation for which the defendant was convicted was to disrupt or hinder law enforcement....

Reference

Full Case Name
Alberto Elio SAN PEDRO v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published