Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Fitzpatrick v. State

Fitzpatrick v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 14, 1989 · Sharp
553 So. 2d 396; 1989 WL 150088 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Fitzpatrick v. State

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

553 So.2d 396 (1989)

Patricia FITZPATRICK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 89-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

December 14, 1989.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Fleming Lee, Asst. Atty. Gen., Supervising Atty., and Robin A. Compton, Certified Legal Intern, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

SHARP, Judge.

Fitzpatrick appeals the imposition of costs and the order of restitution imposed without notice and opportunity to be heard. The state concedes error. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Brooks v. State, 490 So.2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). We therefore quash the imposition of costs and the order of restitution.

ORDER QUASHED as to costs and restitution.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.