Gates v. State
Gates v. State
535 So. 2d 359; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 157; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 10; 1989 WL 88
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gates v. State
Opinion of the Court
The record shows that during the oral pronouncement of sentence, the trial judge made inconsistent statements concerning whether he intended to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences on appellant. The sentences rendered maintained this inconsistency. Therefore, we affirm appellant’s convictions and remand this cause to the trial court with directions to clarify the sentences imposed and to enter such corrected sentencing orders as may be appropriate.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.