Branham v. State
Branham v. State
537 So. 2d 196; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 252; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 197; 1989 WL 3273
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Branham v. State
Opinion of the Court
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.