Fanning v. State
Fanning v. State
537 So. 2d 197; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 247; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 210; 1989 WL 3275
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Fanning v. State
Opinion of the Court
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs and attorney fees without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.