Rutherford v. State
Rutherford v. State
537 So. 2d 200; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 247; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 10669; 1989 WL 3280
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Rutherford v. State
Opinion of the Court
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.