Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Link v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 31, 1989 · No. 88-1491 · Barkdull, Jorgenson, Schwartz

537 So. 2d 696; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 360; 1989 WL 6226 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Stanley v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Robinson v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant as an habitual offender because the trial court’s oral pronouncements were not supported by written, specific findings of fact. We, therefore, remand for the trial court to set forth a written factual basis for its habitual offender determination and to resen-tence the defendant. Watson v. State, 492 So.2d 831 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.