Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Tishman v. Singer

Tishman v. Singer
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 8, 1989 · Garrett, Glickstein, Kahn, Martin
537 So. 2d 718; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 504; 1989 WL 9139 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Tishman v. Singer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary final judgment entered as to Count I and II, but decline to consider Count IV. The order directed to Count IV is not appealable per Rule 9.130 or Rule 9.030, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. White Palms of Palm Beach, Inc., v. Fox, 525 So.2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Paint v. Pompano Beach Bank & Trust Co., 208 So.2d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). Consideration of all of the issues and arguments raised by appellant establishes that there are no genuine issues of fact left to be resolved and that the lower court correctly resolved Counts I and II.

AFFIRMED as to Counts I and II, and DISMISSED as to Count IV.

GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.