It was error not to require the wife to return to the husband a set of china which constituted his separate property and which he had brought into the marriage. See Gardner v. Gardner, 452 So.2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). In all other respects, the property distribution was equitable. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla. 1980).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.