Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

State v. Dixon

State v. Dixon
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 14, 1989 · Barkdull, Cope, Ferguson
539 So. 2d 38; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 683; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1316; 1989 WL 21470 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Dixon

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court failed to provide any reasons for its downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. The defendant concedes, correctly, that a sentence which departs downward from the guidelines must be supported by written reasons as required by section 921.001(6), Florida Statutes (1987), and Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.701(b)(6) and 3.701(d)(ll). See State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Martinez, 534 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

The sentence is vacated and the cause is remanded for further consistent proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.