Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Rhodes v. Rhodes

Rhodes v. Rhodes
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 16, 1989 · Dauksch, Goshorn, Orfinger
539 So. 2d 610; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 699; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1375; 1989 WL 22560 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rhodes v. Rhodes

Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a marriage dissolution judgment. Because the court erred in requiring the estate of the husband to pay support alimony after his death, we reverse and strike that provision from the judgment. O’Malley v. Pan American Bank of Orlando, 384 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1980); Cleveland v. Cleveland, 445 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); White v. White, 429 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

*611AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

ORFINGER and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.