Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Benka v. Outerbridge

Benka v. Outerbridge
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 22, 1989 · Hall, Lehan, Patterson
539 So. 2d 620; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 767; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1506; 1989 WL 25435 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Benka v. Outerbridge

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant failed to object or acquiesced in the trial court to the various aspects raised on appeal regarding jury instructions and evidence. Thus, those aspects were not preserved for appeal. See Rindfleisch v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 498 So.2d 488, 491-92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc., 417 So.2d 275, 276-77 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.