Benka v. Outerbridge

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Benka v. Outerbridge, 539 So. 2d 620 (1989)
14 Fla. L. Weekly 767; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1506; 1989 WL 25435
Hall, Lehan, Patterson

Benka v. Outerbridge

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant failed to object or acquiesced in the trial court to the various aspects raised on appeal regarding jury instructions and evidence. Thus, those aspects were not preserved for appeal. See Rindfleisch v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 498 So.2d 488, 491-92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc., 417 So.2d 275, 276-77 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Richard BENKA, Cross-Appellee v. Yihwa Sung OUTERBRIDGE, M.D., Pier Frank, M.D., Stephen F. Dickey, M.D., P.A., d/b/a Doctor's Walk-In Clinic of North Tampa, F. Reed Murtagh, M.D., Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published