Ingram v. State
Ingram v. State
540 So. 2d 936; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 856; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1858; 1989 WL 32663
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ingram v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence seized in an illegal search. See Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 100 S.Ct. 338, 62 L.Ed.2d 238 (1979), reh. den., 444 U.S. 1049, 100 S.Ct. 741, 62 L.Ed.2d 737 (1980); Julian v. State, 528 So.2d 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Robinson v. State, 527 So.2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Redfin v. State, 453 So.2d 425 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). The conviction is REVERSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.