Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

State v. Mangham

State v. Mangham
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 11, 1989 · Barkdull, Cope, Ferguson
541 So. 2d 166; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 901; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934; 1989 WL 33991 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Mangham

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellee concedes that the sentence must be reversed because the trial court failed to give written reasons to support a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985); State v. Dixon, 539 So.2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Martinez, 534 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

The sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.