Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Akana v. State

Akana v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 27, 1989 · Cobb, Daniel, Orfinger
541 So. 2d 1364; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1044; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168; 1989 WL 41194 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Akana v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, Judge.

The appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed, but the imposition of court costs which were assessed without notice or an opportunity to be heard are quashed. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1988); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1988); Lester v. State, 532 So.2d 63 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Singletary v. State, 530 So.2d 460 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). On remand, after proper notice and hearing, the court may reconsider the imposition of costs.

CONVICTION and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; COSTS QUASHED.

COBB and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.