Akana v. State
Akana v. State
541 So. 2d 1364; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1044; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168; 1989 WL 41194
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Akana v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed, but the imposition of court costs which were assessed without notice or an opportunity to be heard are quashed. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1988); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1988); Lester v. State, 532 So.2d 63 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Singletary v. State, 530 So.2d 460 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). On remand, after proper notice and hearing, the court may reconsider the imposition of costs.
CONVICTION and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; COSTS QUASHED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.