Crooms v. State
Crooms v. State
543 So. 2d 415; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2824; 1989 WL 52817
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Crooms v. State
Opinion of the Court
Having concluded that the matters presented herein are controlled by Gipson v. State, 537 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) and Walker v. State, 514 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987) and that defendants’ motion to suppress should have been granted, we reverse.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.