Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Chandler v. State

Chandler v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 18, 1989 · Cowart, Dauksch, Goshorn
543 So. 2d 428; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2765; 1989 WL 51223 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Chandler v. State

Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction in a drug case. Appellant’s attorney filed an Anders1 brief and appellant then filed a pro se brief. Neither brief brings up anything to warrant reversal but the pro se brief does raise a competency of counsel issue which must first be directed to the trial judge under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑