Rusciano v. State
Rusciano v. State
543 So. 2d 449; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2886; 1989 WL 53352
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Rusciano v. State
Opinion of the Court
The circuit court erred in summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief without holding an evidentiary hearing or attaching to its order that portion of the record which conclusively demonstrates that appellant is entitled to no relief. See Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.