Speller v. State
Speller v. State
545 So. 2d 968; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1637; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3839; 1989 WL 73756
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Speller v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s convictions for burglary of a structure, grand theft, and possession of burglary tools. However, because the concurrent five-and-one-half-year sentences exceed the statutory maximum for each of the offenses, appellant must be resentenced.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.