Creamer v. State
Creamer v. State
546 So. 2d 461; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1723; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4110; 1989 WL 81235
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Creamer v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant contends that the sentences in Circuit Court Case No. 87-485 and Circuit Court Case No. 87-1545 were erroneously not designated as concurrent to one another in accordance with his plea bargain and with the court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. Since the sentence for 87-1545 specifically orders that it shall run concurrent with the sentence in 87-485, we af
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.