Corvo v. State
Corvo v. State
546 So. 2d 787; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1749; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4196; 1989 WL 81649
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Corvo v. State
Opinion of the Court
Upon consideration of the points advanced by appellant, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction for armed robbery. See Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120, 1122-26 (Fla. 1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); Rodriguez v. State, 379 So.2d 657, 658 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 389 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1980); Hernandez v. State, 305 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So.2d 192 (Fla. 1975); § 812.13, Fla.Stat. (1987). Accordingly, no error having been shown, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.