Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

State v. Young

State v. Young
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 29, 1989 · Barkdull, Hubbart, Jorgenson
547 So. 2d 1063; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2048; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4795; 1989 WL 99209 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Young

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon the defendant Thomas Anthony Young’s confession of error, the sentence under review by this appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions: (1) to enter written reasons for the downward departure from the sentencing guidelines imposed below, or (2) to sentence the defendant within the sentencing guidelines. See Burke v. State, 483 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1985); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985), overruled on other grounds, Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 107 S.Ct. 2446, 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987); State v. Alvarez, 538 So.2d 956 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Williams, 535 So.2d 357 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. McDavid, 532 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). In the event the latter alternative is chosen by the trial court upon remand, the defendant shall be afforded an opportunity to withdraw his nolo contendere plea because it was entered below in exchange for the appealed-from departure sentence. See State v. Thomas, 516 So.2d 1058, 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); State v. Johnson, 512 So.2d 1116, 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.