Ferguson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Ferguson v. State, 548 So. 2d 1183 (1989)
14 Fla. L. Weekly 2231; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5136; 1989 WL 107522
Goshorn, Orfinger, Sharp

Ferguson v. State

Opinion of the Court

GOSHORN, Judge.

The appellant, Robert Ferguson, appeals his guideline departure sentence because the trial judge did not provide written reasons for departure as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Accordingly, the sentence is vacated and remanded for resen-tencing. See Wilkerson v. State, 513 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1987); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985), superceded on other grounds by Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 107 S.Ct. 2446, 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987). If, upon remand, the trial court imposes a departure sentence, it must supply written reasons. Pope v. State, 542 So.2d 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SHARP, J. and ORFINGER, M., J., (retired), concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert Ray FERGUSON v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published