Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Capital Bank v. Manguart

Capital Bank v. Manguart
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 26, 1989 · Gersten, Hubbart, Schwartz
549 So. 2d 234; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2258; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5197; 1989 WL 110944 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Capital Bank v. Manguart

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Capital Bank appeals from a post-judgment order granting a motion for a protective order directing that the deposition of a nonparty witness, not be had. We quash the protective order. The deposition sought can proceed subject to claims of privilege to be brought before the trial court. See Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, P.A. v. Smith, 416 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The protective order is quashed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.