Capital Bank v. Manguart
Capital Bank v. Manguart
549 So. 2d 234; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2258; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5197; 1989 WL 110944
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Capital Bank v. Manguart
Opinion of the Court
Appellant Capital Bank appeals from a post-judgment order granting a motion for a protective order directing that the deposition of a nonparty witness, not be had. We quash the protective order. The deposition sought can proceed subject to claims of privilege to be brought before the trial court. See Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, P.A. v. Smith, 416 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The protective order is quashed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.