Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 5, 1989 · Cobb, Daniel, Dauksch
549 So. 2d 799; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2350; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5452; 1989 WL 114258 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Johnson v. State

Opinion of the Court

DANIEL, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Curtis Johnson, appeals his conviction and sentence for unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance.

We find Johnson’s appeal without merit, but remand to the trial court for the entry of a corrected judgment. Johnson was charged in count I of the information with unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance, section 893.13(l)(a)(l), which is a second degree felony. However, the written judgment stated that he was convicted of section “893.13(l)(a)(l), F-3.” The judgment should have read “893.13(l)(a)(l), F-2.” Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed but the case is remanded for correction of the scrivener’s error in the written judgment.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected judgment.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ„ concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.