Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Key v. State

Key v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 6, 1989 · Hall, Scheb, Threadgill
549 So. 2d 816; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2387; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5468; 1989 WL 116617 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Key v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. Appellant cannot raise on direct appeal the voluntariness of his “open” no contest plea. Instead, this issue should first be presented to the trial court in a motion to withdraw that plea. Counts v. State, 376 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). As for appellant’s contention that the imposition of consecutive minimum mandatory sentences may violate Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1983), the record presently before us is not sufficient for this court to make that determination. Again, appellant may raise this issue via Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Daniels v. Smith, 478 So.2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.