Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Meza v. State

Meza v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 8, 1989 · Gunther, Hersey, Polen
551 So. 2d 600; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2573; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6157; 1989 WL 133055 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Meza v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions of armed kidnapping, armed sexual battery, armed burglary of a dwelling and burglary of a conveyance. We also affirm the sentence imposed for Count IV, armed burglary of a dwelling. The state concedes error in sentencing on Counts I, II, III and V. We agree and reverse for resentencing on these counts.

We also strike the imposition of costs and attorney’s fees for failure to give the appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.