Stromn v. State
Stromn v. State
552 So. 2d 352; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2743; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6594; 1989 WL 142954
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Stromn v. State
Opinion of the Court
REVERSED. We find the record of the question and answer exchange between the appellant and the trial court insufficient to constitute a factual predicate for the trial court’s adjudication of direct criminal contempt. See Silver v. State, 117 So.2d 509 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.