Lambert v. State
Lambert v. State
552 So. 2d 1154; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6189; 1989 WL 133277
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Lambert v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant pled nolo contendere with a reservation of the right to appeal denial of the motion to suppress. We affirm under authority of United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982), and Caplan v. State, 531 So.2d 88, 91-92 & n. 2 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, — U.S. — , 109 S.Ct. 1577, 103 L.Ed.2d 942 (1989).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.