Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Tim v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 8, 1989 · Frank, Lehan, Parker

553 So. 2d 370; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2834; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6850; 1989 WL 147940 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Order on Prosecution of Cr. App. (Fla. 1990)
Gesell v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to our prior decision in Sotolongo v. State, 530 So.2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), in which we reversed the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence filed by appellant’s codefendant, and because the facts in both cases are indistinguishable, the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence is reversed. We reject the state’s argument that the “good faith” exception to the warrant requirement enunciated in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), should apply.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.