Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

King v. King

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 20, 1989 · Glickstein, Walden, Warner

553 So. 2d 396; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7244; 1989 WL 153670 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Fitzpatrick v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The pro se appellant asserts as error the trial court’s failure to grant his motion to dismiss this dissolution action. The appel-lee takes the position that the motion was evidentiary and directed to the merits of the ease. However, it was not set for hearing before the trial court, nor did appellant appear at the final judgment hearing to assert his position. Since the error, if any, was not preserved in the trial court, *397we must affirm. Palmer v. Thomas, 284 So.2d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.