Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Shop N Go v. Kirkland

Shop N Go v. Kirkland
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 19, 1989 · Joanos, Thompson, Wentworth
553 So. 2d 771; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2923; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7058; 1989 WL 152164 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Shop N Go v. Kirkland

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

*772JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. WENTWORTH, J., concurs with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

WENTWORTH, J.,

concurring.

I join with the majority in affirming the order of the judge of compensation claims, and further note the testimony of claimant’s treating psychologist that claimant has had and will continue to have anxiety and depressive disorders which have been aggravated by her industrial accident. The judge’s conclusion that claimant’s disability is permanent and total in nature is supported by her psychologist’s assessment that a job search alone would “bring her back into active psychological care again,” and that she suffers from a permanent anxiety disorder that is “out of control quite easily and quite quickly.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.