Spears v. Enfinger
Spears v. Enfinger
554 So. 2d 25; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7428; 1989 WL 153625
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Spears v. Enfinger
Opinion of the Court
Appellants, Wastle and Lillian Spears, have failed to show the way of necessity approved by the trial court was unreasonable, impracticable or substantially inadequate. Even though we, sitting as fact-finders, may have arrived at a different result, we cannot say that the trial court’s exercise of authority was a reversible abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we herewith affirm the trial court’s finding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.