Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Spears v. Enfinger

Spears v. Enfinger
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 22, 1989 · Miner, Smith, Thompson
554 So. 2d 25; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7428; 1989 WL 153625 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Spears v. Enfinger

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Wastle and Lillian Spears, have failed to show the way of necessity approved by the trial court was unreasonable, impracticable or substantially inadequate. Even though we, sitting as fact-finders, may have arrived at a different result, we cannot say that the trial court’s exercise of authority was a reversible abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we herewith affirm the trial court’s finding.

SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.