Blaine v. Marmor
Blaine v. Marmor
555 So. 2d 1241; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2662; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6393; 1989 WL 136151
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Blaine v. Marmor
Opinion of the Court
As the record shows that appellant is a stranger to the note as to which he seeks to recover allegedly usurious payments, dismissal of plaintiff’s action is affirmed. See Nesbitt v. Citicorp Savings, 514 So.2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.