Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1989

Okaloosa County v. Okaloosa Island Leaseholders

Okaloosa County v. Okaloosa Island Leaseholders
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 12, 1989 · Miner, Smith, Thompson
558 So. 2d 1029; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6883; 1989 WL 201081 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Okaloosa County v. Okaloosa Island Leaseholders

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, C.J., and THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.

070rehearing

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING, CLARIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION

We deny appellant’s motions for rehearing and certification, and grant their motion for clarification as follows. We affirm the trial court’s interpretation of the subject covenants and restrictions. However, we hereby clarify our per curiam affirmance and hold that Okaloosa County, Florida possesses neither more nor fewer rights and obligations in the premises than did the Okaloosa Island Authority pursuant to the terms of the covenants and restrictions and the relevant laws of Florida. (See Chapters 29336, (1953), 61-2567 and 75-456, Laws of Florida.)

SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.