Nichols v. State
Nichols v. State
554 So. 2d 669; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 62; 1990 WL 770
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Nichols v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the defendant’s judgments and sentences for two separate acts, sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine. The trial court correctly enhanced the sentence under the habitual offender statute and made the necessary findings on the record. § 775.084, Fla.Stat. (1987). On remand, however, each sentence shall be clerically corrected to reflect that the defendant was sentenced under the special provisions for habitual offenders.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.