Smith v. State
Smith v. State
555 So. 2d 946; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 197; 1990 WL 2412
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant alleges, and appellee does not contest the issue, that costs were assessed against him without notice or an opportunity to be heard. That was error. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Rucker v. State, 553 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
The order assessing costs is reversed. The conviction for armed robbery and the sentence are affirmed.
AFFIRMED m part; REVERSED in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.