Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

H.F. v. State

H.F. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 20, 1990 · Barkdull, Cope, Gersten
556 So. 2d 543; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 911; 1990 WL 15383 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

H.F. v. State

Opinion of the Court

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, H.F., appeals his conviction and sentence for burglary, grand theft, and *544criminal mischief on the ground the evidence was legally insufficient to present a prima facie case. Based upon the State’s confession of error and our own independent review of this case, we reverse and remand for discharge of appellant. Jaramillo v. State, 417 So.2d 257 (Fla. 1982); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 1981), affirmed, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); M.F. v. State, 549 So.2d 225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); E.L.S. v. State, 547 So.2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑