Eiselle v. State
Eiselle v. State
556 So. 2d 835; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 997; 1990 WL 14258
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Eiselle v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the final judgment, but reverse the sentence imposed and remand so that the trial court may strike the provision for costs, imposed without notice, or conduct a hearing to impose costs. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.