Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Pierson v. National Insurance Ass'n

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 27, 1990 · Barkdull, Cope, Gersten

557 So. 2d 227; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1194; 1990 WL 17489 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We conclude, as did the trial court, that the liability coverage exclusion1 does not *228contravene section 324.151, Florida Statutes (1987), and is enforceable in the present case. Reid v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 352 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 1977); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Baker, 543 So.2d 847 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Newman v. National Indemnity Co., 245 So.2d 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).

Affirmed.

. “We do not provide liability coverage for any person for bodily injury to you or any family member.” Plaintiff was the owner of the insured vehicle, and was a passenger therein at the time of the accident.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.