Limat v. State
Limat v. State
557 So. 2d 242; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1310; 1990 WL 20550
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Limat v. State
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
We grant the public defender’s Anders motion to withdraw. We agree that the designated judicial acts are wholly frivolous and without merit. The public defender has complied with the requirements set forth in Anders and recently addressed by the supreme court in Forrester. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Order of the First District Court of Appeal Regarding Brief Filed in Forrester v. State, 556 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1990). We affirm the conviction and sentence and grant the public defender’s motion to withdraw.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.