Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Russo v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 30, 1990 · Cope, Goderich, Levy

557 So. 2d 596; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 549; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 285 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

FLORIDA NAT. BANK v. Bankatlantic (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction of possession of, and trafficking in, controlled substances. We conclude that the amendment to the information did not prejudice the defendant, see State v. Anderson, 537 So.2d 1373, 1375 (Fla. 1989); that the motion for mistrial with respect to the joint trial with the codefendant was correctly denied, see Johnson v. State, 355 So.2d 143 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 362 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1978); and that there was sufficient evidence both with respect to the weight of the cocaine and with respect to the elements of conspiracy. See LaPolla v. State, 504 So.2d 1353, 1357 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.