Rose v. Clinton
Rose v. Clinton
557 So. 2d 614; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 799; 1990 WL 11810
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Rose v. Clinton
Opinion of the Court
The interim order determining James J. Clinton, III, to be a shareholder in Consolidated Dyeing, Inc., and entitled to an accounting is not a final judgment, Fla.R. App.P. 9.030(b)(1)(A), or an appealable non-final order, Peters v. Menendez, 491 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Dauer v. Freed, 444 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3).
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.