Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Smoak v. State

Smoak v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 14, 1990 · Dell, Glickstein, Letts
557 So. 2d 693; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1566; 1990 WL 26245 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Smoak v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief, in which he sought inter alia to withdraw his plea of guilty to the charge of battery on a law enforcement officer. We reverse.

We remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant had effective assistance of counsel when he entered his plea of guilty to the charge of battery. We further direct the trial court to determine whether appellant freely, voluntarily and with an understanding of the consequences of his act, entered his plea of guilty to this charge.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

GLICKSTEIN, Judge,

concurring specially.

While I agree we should reverse, I would remand with direction to allow the defendant to withdraw his plea' of guilty, as we did in Bass v. State, 541 So.2d 1336, 1338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.