Hunt v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Hunt v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners, 558 So. 2d 156 (1990)
1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1720; 1990 WL 26689
Barfield, Ervin, Wentworth

Hunt v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners

Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR STAY

PER CURIAM.

Appellant files a motion to stay the final order of the Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners (Board), pending this appeal. We deny the motion for stay.

The final order of the Board, among other things, placed appellant’s license on probation for two years with specific restrictions. In support of his motion for stay pending appeal, appellant cites to Section 120.68(3), Florida Statutes, which states that “if the agency decision has the effect of suspending or revoking a license, super-sedeas shall be granted as a matter of right....” The final order of the Board neither suspended nor revoked the appellant’s license, accordingly, the automatic stay provision of Section 120.68(3), is not applicable. The motion for stay is denied.

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Orrin T. HUNT v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINERS
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published