Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Lewis v. State

Lewis v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 15, 1990 · Cobb, Griffin, Peterson
558 So. 2d 170; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1619; 1990 WL 26948 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Lewis v. State

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a guideline departure sentence. With one exception, the reasons given for departure were based on probation violations and are invalid. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1989); Ree v. State, 14 F.L.W. 565 (Fla. Nov. 16, 1989). The trial court also based departure on a “continuous and persistent and escalating pattern of criminal conduct” consisting of the commission of sale of cocaine offenses twice in a seven month period. This conduct does not constitute the escalating or persistent pattern of criminal conduct adequate to form a basis for departure. Maddox v. State, 553 So.2d 1380, 1382 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence in Case No. 88-8113 is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing within the guidelines. The defendant’s sentence in Case No. 88-1847 is affirmed because it does not depart from the sentencing guidelines.

Sentence AFFIRMED in part VACATED in part; case REMANDED for resentenc-ing consistent with this opinion.

COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.