Robinson v. State
Robinson v. State
558 So. 2d 196; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871; 1990 WL 31709
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Robinson v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in convicting and sentencing appellant for both sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell, where the cocaine in question consisted of a single “rock.” See Wright v. State, 557 So.2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we direct the trial court to vacate the judgment and sentence for possession with intent to sell.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.