Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Wells v. State

Wells v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 22, 1990 · Cowart, Goshorn, Harris
558 So. 2d 205; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1824; 1990 WL 31539 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wells v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed except for the imposition of costs pursuant to sections 27.3455; 960.20; and 943.25, Florida Statutes (1987), which were imposed without the requisite notice and opportunity to be heard required by Florida law. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (FIa. 1989); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). This provision is stricken without prejudice to be assessed in accordance with due process requirements.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

COWART, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.