Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Herrera v. Garcia

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 6, 1990 · Jorgenson, Levy, Schwartz

559 So. 2d 83; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 661; 1990 WL 8659 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Monroe Cty. v. Pigeon Key Hist. Park (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Cardet v. Resolution Trust Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because a default was prematurely entered after the mailing of the answer on the 20th day after service, see Meyerson v. Block, 404 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), the default and default judgment based upon it1 are reversed and the cause is remanded for further consistent proceedings.

. Since no default should have been entered initially, it is not necessary to show a meritorious defense as a condition to setting it aside. Cohen v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, 433 So.2d 1354, 1355 n. 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.